End-to-End Disaggregated System: Mobile Core and Split-RAN Architecture

End-to-End Disaggregated System: Mobile Core and Split-RAN Architecture
End-to-End Disaggregated System: Mobile Core and Split-RAN Architecture
5G & 6G Prime Membership Telecom

Introduction: Why Disaggregation is Key for Mobile Networks

As telecom companies gear up for 5G and beyond, there's a growing need for networks that can scale, respond quickly, and provide flexibility. This is leading us away from traditional, hardware-heavy setups. The answer? Disaggregated systems, which break down the conventional all-in-one functions into modular, software-driven parts.

The diagram illustrates an end-to-end disaggregated system that includes:

Mobile Core (EPC/5GC functions).

Split-RAN architecture (Central Unit, Distributed Unit, Radio Unit).

A Near-RT RIC (Near Real-Time RAN Intelligent Controller) for optimization.

This approach allows operators to create networks that are cloud-native, programmable, and cost-effective.

Mobile Core in Disaggregated Systems

The mobile core plays a crucial role in user authentication, ensuring mobility, and forwarding data. In a disaggregated setup, the control and user planes are divided:

PCRF (Policy and Charging Rules Function): Takes care of QoS and charging policies.

MME (Mobility Management Entity): Manages mobility and session control.

SGW-C (Serving Gateway Control Plane): Oversees user session forwarding.

SGW-U (Serving Gateway User Plane): Responsible for forwarding user data packets.

PGW-C (Packet Gateway Control Plane): Manages connections to external networks.

PGW-U (Packet Gateway User Plane): Forwards data packets to the internet or data networks.

HSS (Home Subscriber Server): Stores subscriber data for authentication and profiles.

In disaggregated cores, these functions can be run on virtual machines or containers, which enhances scalability and allows for independent updates.

Split-RAN Architecture

Traditionally, the Radio Access Network (RAN) has been centralized, but with disaggregation, we're seeing a split-RAN model that distributes functionality among three major units:

Central Unit (CU):

Contains higher-layer functions like PDCP (Packet Data Convergence Protocol).

Divided into:

PDCP-C (Control Plane): Deals with signaling, session setup, and control.

PDCP-U (User Plane): Manages user traffic.

Connects with the Near-RT RIC for smart control and optimization.

Distributed Unit (DU):

Handles real-time functions nearer to the cell site.

Includes:

RLC (Radio Link Control) for error correction and retransmissions.

MAC (Medium Access Control) for resource scheduling.

PHY Upper/Lower for processing at the physical layer for radio communications.

Radio Unit (RU):

Positioned at the cell tower, managing radio frequency tasks.

Includes:

D/A Convert (Digital-to-Analog Conversion).

RF Front End for signal transmission to and from user devices.

This distribution sharpens the optimization of latency-sensitive tasks at the edge (DU/RU), while consolidating higher-level tasks in the CU for better efficiency and control.

Role of Near-RT RIC in RAN Intelligence

The Near Real-Time RAN Intelligent Controller (Near-RT RIC) represents a major advancement in O-RAN setups. It enables:

Policy-driven optimization of the RAN.

Closed-loop automation for traffic management, load balancing, and handling interference.

Support for xApps that boost RAN intelligence with modular applications.

In this framework, the Near-RT RIC interacts with both CU and DU through control signaling, ensuring real-time adaptability to network conditions.

Data and Control Plane Separation

The diagram shows how Data and Control are separated:

Control Plane:

Involves functions like MME, SGW-C, PGW-C, PCRF, PDCP-C, and Near-RT RIC.

Looks after signaling, mobility, and session setups.

User Plane (Data):

Includes SGW-U, PGW-U, PDCP-U, RLC, MAC, PHY, RU.

Responsible for actual data transfer to and from user devices.

This separation (CUPS: Control and User Plane Separation) is crucial in 5G architecture, allowing for independent scaling of both signaling and traffic operations.

Advantages of End-to-End Disaggregated Systems

Disaggregation offers a range of advantages for both operators and businesses:

Flexibility: Core, CU, DU, and RU can be deployed independently.

Cloud-Native: Functions can operate in containers or VNFs for greater agility.

Scalability: User and control planes can scale independently.

Vendor Diversity: Operators can mix and match hardware and software from different vendors.

Cost Efficiency: Lower CAPEX/OPEX by leveraging standard hardware.

Low Latency: Processing happens closer to the edge (DU/RU).

Automation: Near-RT RIC facilitates intelligent, AI-driven RAN management.

Example Workflow in a Disaggregated System

User Equipment (UE) connects to the RU through RF signals.

The RU executes RF and D/A conversion and sends signals to the DU.

The DU carries out MAC scheduling, RLC, and PHY functions, passing higher-layer tasks to the CU.

The CU’s PDCP-C/U processes control signaling and user data.

Functions in the Mobile Core (MME, SGW, PGW, PCRF, HSS) authenticate users, manage sessions, and reroute traffic.

The Near-RT RIC continuously tweaks RAN parameters in near real-time.

Comparison: Traditional vs. Disaggregated Architecture

Aspect Traditional Network Disaggregated System

RAN Architecture Monolithic eNodeB/gNodeB Split into CU, DU, RU

Mobile Core Integrated EPC/5GC Control/User plane separation (CUPS)

Scalability Limited Independent scaling of control & data

Latency Optimization Centralized Edge-based processing at DU/RU

Vendor Flexibility Proprietary Multi-vendor interoperability

Intelligence & Automation Static configuration AI/ML-driven Near-RT RIC optimization

Future Outlook of Disaggregated Networks

Looking ahead, end-to-end disaggregation is set to be the foundation for 5G evolution and 6G:

6G Native AI: AI-enhanced RICs will automatically optimize network functions in real time.

Cloud-Edge Convergence: CU and core functions will move closer to MEC for ultra-low latency.

Network Slicing Expansion: Disaggregation makes managing and isolating slices easier from end to end.

Open RAN Ecosystem: Disaggregation encourages interoperability across various vendors and open standards.

Conclusion

The end-to-end disaggregated system, which features both the mobile core and split-RAN (CU, DU, RU), is transforming telecom architecture. By separating data and control planes, adopting cloud-native strategies, and including Near-RT RIC for intelligence, operators enjoy unmatched agility, scalability, and efficiency.

For telecom experts, getting a firm grasp on disaggregated systems is crucial—this is what will underpin 5G and 6G networks.

The future is all about open, modular, and intelligent networks, with disaggregation at the forefront.