Sign in Subscribe

Explain the concept of fork in a blockchain network.

Last updated on 

A blockchain network, a fork occurs when a blockchain diverges into two separate chains due to a disagreement among network participants regarding the validity of transactions or the consensus rules. This can happen for several reasons, including software bugs, protocol upgrades, or deliberate decisions by network participants.

There are two main types of forks: soft forks and hard forks.

  1. Soft Forks:
    • A soft fork occurs when a change is made to the blockchain protocol that tightens the rules for block validation.
    • In a soft fork, the new rules are backward-compatible with the old rules. This means that nodes running the updated software will still accept blocks created by nodes running the old software.
    • However, blocks created by nodes running the old software may be rejected by nodes running the updated software if they do not adhere to the new rules.
    • Soft forks typically result in a temporary fork in the blockchain, but eventually, the chain with the most accumulated proof of work (or another consensus mechanism) becomes the canonical chain, and the fork is resolved.
  2. Hard Forks:
    • A hard fork occurs when a change is made to the blockchain protocol that introduces rules that are not backward-compatible with the old rules.
    • Nodes running the old software will consider blocks created by nodes running the new software as invalid, and vice versa.
    • This results in a permanent divergence of the blockchain into two separate chains, each following its own set of rules.
    • Hard forks often require all participants in the network to upgrade their software to continue participating in the new chain.
    • Examples of hard forks include protocol upgrades that change the block size limit, consensus algorithm, or introduce new features.

When a fork occurs, it can lead to the creation of two separate blockchains, each with its own transaction history and network of participants. The chain with the most accumulated proof of work (or the consensus mechanism's equivalent) typically becomes the dominant chain, while the other chain may wither away due to lack of support or merge back into the dominant chain.