Multi-Tenant Multi-Instance IMS Network in VDC: A Deep Dive into Virtualized Telecom Core Architectures

Multi-Tenant Multi-Instance IMS Network in VDC: A Deep Dive into Virtualized Telecom Core Architectures
Multi-Tenant Multi-Instance IMS Network in VDC: A Deep Dive into Virtualized Telecom Core Architectures
5G & 6G Prime Membership Telecom

Understanding the Multi-Tenant Multi-Instance IMS Network in Virtual Data Centers (VDCs)

Telecom networks are quickly shifting towards cloud-native, multi-tenant architectures. This allows service providers to host several virtualized IMS cores on a shared infrastructure. The model of Multi-Tenant Multi-Instance IMS Network in VDC, depicted in the diagram, shows how each tenant runs its own IMS instance—covering signaling, media, and management layers—within a common Virtual Data Center.

This setup offers isolation, scalability, and centralized management, enabling operators, MVNOs, and businesses to take advantage of Network Function Virtualization (NFV) and cloud orchestration for flexible and efficient service delivery.

Overview of the Multi-Tenant Multi-Instance IMS Concept

In traditional telecom setups, each operator or service provider has its own dedicated physical IMS core, which can be quite expensive and resource-intensive. The multi-tenant multi-instance model addresses this by virtualizing IMS components and deploying them within a shared cloud while ensuring logical separation for each tenant.

Multi-Tenant → This means multiple service providers or businesses share the same cloud infrastructure.

Multi-Instance → Every tenant maintains its own IMS instance, which guarantees independent operation, data privacy, and tailored service policies.

This approach offers a great mix of resource efficiency and tenant autonomy, a crucial aim of modern telco cloud transformation.

Architecture Breakdown: Components and Connectivity

The diagram illustrates a multi-layered architecture that integrates tenant networks, IMS clusters, management layers, and shared storage, all linked through a data center (DC) switching fabric.

Key Architectural Layers:

A. Tenant Networks (Access & Core Integration)

Each tenant connects its external access network (like RAN or broadband) to the IMS core in the cloud via dedicated links:

Access Layer: Takes care of user traffic entering from radio or IP networks.

Core Layer: Manages backbone routing, session control, and connecting to the IMS network.

Between these layers, a Session Border Gateway (SBG) provides security, protocol normalization, and traffic segregation for each tenant.

B. Data Center Switching and Storage Infrastructure

At the core of this architecture is the DC Switch and Firewall (FW), which connects tenant environments with shared components:

Central Storage: Keeps subscriber databases, media libraries, and logs.

OAM (Operations, Administration, and Maintenance): Ensures monitoring and orchestration visibility for all tenants.

This arrangement allows multiple IMS instances to utilize shared yet securely partitioned storage resources and network capacity.

C. Tenant IMS Networks

Every tenant operates its own dedicated IMS Network instance within the VDC. The IMS instance consists of various functional clusters and VNFs that replicate the roles of a traditional IMS core.

Tenant IMS Components Explained

Component Description CSCF Cluster Manages SIP signaling, call routing, and registration, including P-CSCF, I-CSCF, and S-CSCF functions. HSS Cluster Stores subscriber profiles and authentication data. MTAS Cluster Handles IMS-based telephony and service logic. PGM Manages session policies and traffic flows between IMS and external networks. IDNS Provides name resolution and service discovery for VNFs within the IMS domain. MFRP Oversees real-time media resources, transcoding, and RTP stream handling. VR Facilitates internal routing and network segmentation between signaling, media, and OAM VLANs.

These clusters connect via three types of VLANs:

OAM VLAN: For management and monitoring.

Signaling VLAN: For SIP and Diameter signaling traffic.

Media VLAN: For RTP and media stream transmission.

This setup ensures network security, QoS prioritization, and fault isolation across tenants.

Role of the Network Operations Center (NOC)

The NOC plays a vital role in overseeing the whole environment. Using the OAM interface, the NOC conducts:

Real-time monitoring of VNFs and network performance.

Fault detection and resolution.

VNF lifecycle management, which includes scaling and healing.

Security and compliance enforcement across tenant domains.

With automation tools and telemetry data at its disposal, the NOC ensures continuous service availability and operational efficiency in a complex multi-tenant environment.

Data Flow and Inter-Tenant Isolation

Signaling Flow:

User equipment (UE) connects through the Access layer.

Traffic is channeled through the SBG and DC Switch to the tenant’s CSCF cluster.

Each tenant’s IMS core handles signaling independently, ensuring session integrity and isolation.

Media Flow:

Media packets go through media VLANs to the MFRP.

MFRP manages transcoding, RTP relay, or NAT traversal.

Streams are directed to the relevant user or service endpoints.

Isolation Mechanisms:

Dedicated VLANs per tenant ensure traffic separation.

Per-tenant IMS clusters prevent any cross-tenant data leakage.

Firewall policies and virtual routers (VRs) enforce separation on both the data and control plane levels.

Advantages of Multi-Tenant Multi-Instance IMS in VDC

This architecture combines efficiency, flexibility, and scalability, making it great for modern telecom operations.

A. Complete Tenant Independence

Each tenant manages its own IMS network, with dedicated signaling and media resources, which allows for autonomy in configuration, upgrades, and troubleshooting.

B. Optimized Resource Utilization

Sharing the underlying DC and storage infrastructure helps operators get the most out of their hardware without compromising performance or reliability.

C. Scalability and Elasticity

Tenants can dynamically adjust VNFs (like adding CSCF or MTAS instances) based on traffic needs, taking advantage of the cloud’s elasticity.

D. Simplified Management

Centralized OAM and automation frameworks make managing the network across tenants faster and easier, leading to quicker provisioning and less operational overhead.

E. High Security and Compliance

Utilizing VLAN-based segmentation and specific VRs for each tenant, this design maintains strong security boundaries while keeping in line with regulatory standards.

IMS Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) Alignment

This setup closely aligns with ETSI NFV reference models. Each IMS cluster functions as a Virtual Network Function (VNF) that can be orchestrated by an NFV Management and Orchestration (MANO) system.

VNF Manager (VNFM): Manages the lifecycle of individual VNFs like CSCF or HSS.

NFV Orchestrator (NFVO): Coordinates orchestration and resource management across tenants.

Virtual Infrastructure Manager (VIM): Allocates compute, storage, and networking resources within the data center.

This layered orchestration approach allows for automation, interoperability, and policy-driven orchestration throughout the telecom cloud.

Practical Use Cases

  1. Multi-Operator IMS Hosting

Infrastructure providers can host various mobile or fixed operators’ IMS cores, each within its own VDC tenant, cutting CapEx while ensuring isolation.

  1. MVNO Enablement

MVNOs can set up dedicated IMS instances in a host operator’s cloud, offering branded VoLTE, VoWiFi, and rich communication services.

  1. Private Enterprise IMS

Large companies can employ isolated IMS cores for secure internal communications and unified collaboration systems.

  1. 5G Core Integration

With 5G network slicing, each slice can act as a virtual tenant, with IMS instances aligning with different service types or SLAs.

Challenges and Considerations

Even with its benefits, putting multi-tenant multi-instance IMS in VDCs into practice requires careful planning:

Orchestration complexity — Coordinating lifecycle management across several tenants.

Resource contention — Avoiding performance slowdowns during peak demands.

Interoperability — Ensuring standardized VNF interfaces and APIs.

Security enforcement — Keeping consistent security across dynamic multi-tenant environments.

Embracing automation, AI-driven orchestration, and DevOps practices can help tackle these challenges effectively.

Conclusion

The Multi-Tenant Multi-Instance IMS Network in VDC stands at the forefront of telecom cloud innovation. By letting each tenant run separate IMS instances on shared infrastructure, operators can achieve a scalable, efficient, and secure deployment model that's ready for 5G, NFV, and beyond.

This design enables telecom service providers, MVNOs, and enterprises to roll out services quickly, cut costs, and keep operational independence—all while harnessing the power of virtualization, orchestration, and automation.

As the industry moves further towards cloud-native and containerized IMS architectures, this multi-tenant approach will undoubtedly remain a cornerstone of agile, next-gen telecom networks.